On 4/6/2011 1:15 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote: > Le 06/04/2011 18:43, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit : >> On 04/06/2011 11:41 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >>> On 04/06/2011 11:38 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >>>> So did we go back and fix the zoom steps? I remember one step was >>>> commented >>>> out: 0.7. >>>> >>>> It needs to be enabled now, and absolutely so on Linux. >>> >>> Currently on Linux, if you start eeschema without loading a schematic, the >>> sheet border is off screen on top and bottom, suggesting the initial zoom is >>> not optimal for viewing the border. >>> >>> Is this intentional? >> >> It happens in any loading of a schematic, and any sheet change within a >> schematic also, and therefore cannot be intentional. >> > > I do not have this problem. > Is it a recent issue (BestZoom() was slightly modified in eeschema to fix > issue > for zoom = 0.7) ? >
I have the same problem as well when the aspect ratio of the drawing window is not close to that of the schematic page size. If wxWidgets 2.9 takes care of the non-integer zoom sizes and the problem doesn't exist on Linux or OSX, why not revert to the old behavior of best zoom and put 0.7 back into the zoom list if we are going to make wxWidget 2.9 a build requirement on windows? Wayne _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
