On Tuesday 01 February 2011 10:33:31 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Hannes <list_kde-free...@soulrebel.in-berlin.de> writes: > > Zitat von "Raphael Kubo da Costa" <kub...@gmail.com>: > >> Hmm, I hope when 4.6.x migrates to the ports tree kdepim remains > >> at the 4.4.x series until a stable release is made, otherwise > >> we will have problems. > > > > Hm, I think its really bad that kdepim hasn't had updates in a > > year, since it is core functionality of KDE SC and it does have > > serious issues that need to be adressed. > > Actually, kdepim 4.4.x did not stop being developed when the rest of > the development for KDE SC 4.4.x ceased -- kdepim 4.4.10 was released > just a few days ago, for example (and is likely to be the last 4.4.x > release). > > The idea is/was to keep working and releasing 4.4.x while 4.5.x (which > later became 4.6.x) was still a WIP. > > >> Can you compile at least the pim-related ports with > >> WITH_DEBUG=1, check if you need to enable some debug > >> information with 'kdebugdialog' and then run this again? You > >> should get some more useful output. > > > > I will try that tomorrow. What is "pim-related" other than kdepim > > and kdepimlibs? > > kdelibs and akonadi would be fine too. > > >> After that, I recommend filing bug reports on bugs.kde.org -- > >> kdepim 4.6 is still under development, and some time ago the > >> developers said they needed more migration reports. > > > > I will do that next, although in general my experience when > > reporting bugs upstream is that everyone says they are > > FreeBSD-related and therefore noone volunteers to fix them :S > > It's usually a problem on both sides -- application maintainers should > not automatically reject bug reports based on the operating system, > OTOH a lot of FreeBSD-related bug reports have useless backtraces > because people don't compile with WITH_DEBUG=1. > > I try to help whenever I can. You can CC me on the bug report if you > want, but the kdepim guys are nice folks and probably won't discard > your report anyway :)
Thank you very much for the offer! Actually after a reboot, KMail works now :) (re-login did not work for some reason). It has lost my filters and my profiles needed to have their sent-folder reset, but other than that migration seems to have been completed successfully! The new Kmail feels really great, finally the interface doesnt block when downloading mail!!! Oh another thing I noticed is that it takes rather long (8-11seconds) to open the options, although I have a fairly high-end system (phenomX4, 3ghz, SSD...). Do you think these minor issues are worth reporting? Regards, Hannes _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
