On Tuesday, 20. March 2007, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Did the no-sm thread reach a result? I've started trying to compile KDE4 > against the Qt4 ports and the -no-sm breaks kdelibs compile (25% in).
Nobody was able to reproduce the crashes I'm seeing so far and I haven't had time to investigate further (KDE/KOffice updates and just recently Qt 3.3.8 getting in the way). Based on that, I would just enable sm for everyone, if that would not quite effectively prevent me from maintaining the ports. I cannot make it a port option either, because a session management enabled Qt4 also happens to be binary incompatible with a -no-sm Qt4 (applications built against an sm-enabled Qt4 won't run with a -no-sm Qt4). -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgpIUcHQTCb3y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
