El Dijous, 11 de setembre de 2014, a les 10:57:17, Kevin Krammer va escriure: > On Thursday, 2014-09-11, 09:33:23, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dijous, 11 de setembre de 2014, a les 08:46:11, Kevin Krammer va > > escriure: > > > The rule to always also install an application icon into Hicolor was > > > meant > > > as an example of a general intent that Hicolor be fully usable. > > > > > > I don't know the details of the icon spec but my understanding was that > > > "document-open" was a specified standard name. > > > > Correct. > > > > > Assuming that is the case it would have implied for me that an icon of > > > this > > > name is always present. > > > > Should be always present in valid themes, yes. > > > > > If not in the current theme then at least in the fallback Hicolor theme. > > > > > > Again based on these prior assumptions on the spec, not having that icon > > > in > > > Hicolor would constitute a bug in the Hicolor theme and should be fixed > > > by > > > adding the icon there,no? > > > > There's no hicolor "theme" per se. Only a bunch of empty folders > > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/icon-theme/releases/hicolor-icon-theme > > -0 .5.tar.gz > > Is there a maintainer for this package? I have no idea
> IMHO the only sensible solution is to make sure that it actually contains > the icons specified. Without it is rather useless as a specification base > line. By reading http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html i think they disagree with you as they mention hicolor for icon apps and not for general icons. Cheers, Albert > > Cheers, > Kevin _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
