On Tuesday 09 September 2014 16:25:26 Kevin Krammer wrote: > Wouldn't a fourth option be to make sure that hicolor is actually a proper > fallback as specified? > > Applications already are more or less required to install their fallbacks > in hicolor, so the shared icons should be there as well, no?
+1. It seems to me that the best solution is to actually use hicolor in the first place, for application icons. Possibly with an oxygen or breeze variant as well, but that's the optional part. I think we're dealing with a not-well-thought-out migration from years ago when we switched from hicolor to oxygen and just renamed every icon without thinking much about interoperability. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
