El Dimecres, 10 de setembre de 2014, a les 16:38:55, David Faure va escriure: > On Tuesday 09 September 2014 16:25:26 Kevin Krammer wrote: > > Wouldn't a fourth option be to make sure that hicolor is actually a proper > > fallback as specified? > > > > Applications already are more or less required to install their fallbacks > > in hicolor, so the shared icons should be there as well, no? > > +1. > > It seems to me that the best solution is to actually use hicolor in the > first place, for application icons.
We're not speaking about application icons here but about KStandardAction icons. Cheers, Albert > > Possibly with an oxygen or breeze variant as well, but that's the optional > part. > > I think we're dealing with a not-well-thought-out migration from years ago > when we switched from hicolor to oxygen and just renamed every icon without > thinking much about interoperability. _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
