On Sunday, September 15, 2013 08:42:31 David Faure wrote: > Data-driven tests *can* be run separately (and therefore qDebugs don't get > confusing), using the "methodName:rowName" syntax as command-line argument. > > Data-driven tests have the huge benefit that they reduce code duplication, > and they make it a lot easier to add new tests (which means people tend to > do it a lot more than with procedural tests). > > I don't see which test "looks for a magic string in the plugin", in this > change request all methods except the last one could easily be factorized, > they perform the exact same steps with different data (and different > expected result). > > If this was Qt I'm pretty sure you'd be required to convert it to > data-driven. But this is KDE, so I'll let you decide (now that you have all > the data...).
I'm not sure I understand it well. Do you have an example? -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
