On Sonntag, 18. Mai 2025 21:32:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Ingo Klöcker wrote: > Yes, there is the theoretical threat that an AI learned code that's under a > less liberal license like the GPL or even under one of the "new" not-OSI- > approved licenses used by certain companies to prevent Amazon from selling > services based on their code (or even proprietary code; for all we know, Co- > Pilot was trained with the entire source code written by Microsoft), but > that's only a problem if the AI cites this code literally so that we could > be sued for plagiarizing. How realistic is this threat?
To turn this discussion into something positive: Maybe we should train our own coding assistant AI(s) for Kate/KDevelop with code relevant for C++ and QML which respects the licenses. We'd have an AI model for writing LGPL code that was trained with KF and Qt source code (and other KDE code that's LGPL- compatible) and we'd have a second AI model for writing GPL code that was trained additionally with all of our GPL code. Kate would automatically use the correct model based on the SPDX license of the current file. Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
