Hi,
On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 09:12, Albert Vaca Cintora <albertv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 08:59 Justin Zobel, <jus...@1707.io> wrote: > > > If the contributor cannot tell you the license(s) of the code that was used > > to generate the code, then it's literally gambling that this code wasn't > > taken from another project by Gemini and used without their permission or > > used in a way that violates the license and opens up the KDE e.V. to > > litigation. > > > I'm no lawyer but I would expect that training AI will fall under fair use of > copyrighted code. If that's not the case already, it will probably be soon. > The benefits of AI to society are too large to autoimpose such a roadblock. > if that would happen, then there is just no copyright protection anymore and all is fair game, I highly doubt that, but yes, that is what companies that want to get rich with deep learning want to have. Greetings Christoph
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
