El Diumenge, 27 de setembre de 2015, a les 14:08:21, Juan Carlos Torres va escriure: > On Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:41:43 PM RISHABH GUPTA wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: > > > El Dissabte, 19 de setembre de 2015, a les 09:55:17, Juan Carlos Torres > > > va > > > > > > escriure: > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > > I've started porting some of the "Basics of KDE 4 Programming" > > > > tutorials > > > > over to KF5 code[1] just to get the ball rolling on updating our docs. > > > > > > They > > > > > > > are basically just a direct port of the code found in the main > > > > tutorials, > > > > with some annotations and references to porting guides or API docs. > > > > > > Who is the target of these tutorials? > > > > > > I understand it's newbies. If it's for newbies, i think the notes about > > > " > > > no > > > more KApplication" and stuff add confusion instead of clarification, > > > newbies > > > don't care how it used to be coded, they just want to learn how to code. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > Admittedly, I went in half blind since I'm not all that familiar with > > > > development myself. It was for both learning and documenting that > > > > > > process. > > > > > > > The KIO stuff in Saving and Loading was particularly tricky and I'm > > > > not > > > > completely sure I did it correctly (It only works with local files, > > > > for > > > > one). > > > > > > > > Hoping someone could give those a look and make the necessary > > > > > > corrections. > > > > > > > And maybe then we can fill it up with more meat like the KDE 4 > > > > versions. > > > > There are still a lot of stuff in Techbase that probably need dusting > > > > up > > > > but I had to start from the beginning and the easiest ones. ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/First_program/KF5 > > > > According to the frameworks porting note > > > > https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Porting_Notes#Message_Box > > > > Kmessage box is no longer a class its a namespace and all the function > > have been either moved to kdelibs4support as kmessagebox_queued.h or to > > kwidgetsaddons as kmessagebox.h,so i guess instead of including > > kmessagebox > > we will have to include the above mentioned files .Correct me i am wrong. > > Hi, > > Thanks for the response and pardon for the late reply. > > Yes, it's a namespace for static functions, so the static function > questionYesNo() is under KMessageBox. It still needs kmessagebox.h to be > included because that is where the functions are defined. But it links to > KF5::WidgetAddons (in CMakeLists.txt). > > Unless I got that wrong too. :)
Yeah KMessageBox is good. Cheers, Albert > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe > >> << >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
