On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> > On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > > So if you ever plan to use KMail you should either wait until the most
> > > severe issues are sorted out with the new stack or use an older
> > > version. Recommending you anything different for a production system
> > > would imo be irresponsible as -- Captain Hindsight strikes ;) -- was
> > > pushing KMail2 in
> > > a maintenance release.
> > 
> > Good thing then that this didn't happen.
> > KMail2 was introduced in a minor release (KDEPIM 4.6. 0), the last
> > maintenance release before that (KDEPIM 4.4.11) still contained KMail1.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Kevin
> 
> Ok.
> So it is the distries that pushed KDEPIM 4.6.0 with all the KDE 4.6.X
> updates (forgot what X it was).

Are there any distributions that have KDEPIM 4.6.0 enabled outside their 
experiemental repositories?

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

Reply via email to