----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 10:25:16 schrieb Matthias Fuchs: > > I am running KMail2 and here it is worse in _every_ aspect than > > KMail1. > > Ok, that was very unfair. There are things KMail2 is better here than > KMail1. > A lot of these have to do with the additional integration. > > So there is a lot of promise what the whole stack can be in the > future, imo it > just does not live up to it yet.
Can I also remind everyone at the severe 'kmail-ate-my-mails' from the KMail1 days? There have been numerous reports that KMail ate mails in certain circumstance. Offline IMAP could potentially corrupt data when hitting check-mail at the wrong time, etc. Let's not remember KMail1 as being heaven. It was certainly not. To address those issues KMail2 was created, that it is not (yet) fully working is a fact, but don't say KMail1 always worked nicely, if that would have been the case, it would not have been rewritten. Best, -- Tom Albers >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
