Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 08:47:47 schrieb Tom Albers: > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > > > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 10:25:16 schrieb Matthias Fuchs: > > > I am running KMail2 and here it is worse in _every_ aspect than > > > KMail1. > > > > Ok, that was very unfair. There are things KMail2 is better here than > > KMail1. > > A lot of these have to do with the additional integration. > > > > So there is a lot of promise what the whole stack can be in the > > future, imo it > > just does not live up to it yet. > > Can I also remind everyone at the severe 'kmail-ate-my-mails' from the > KMail1 days? There have been numerous reports that KMail ate mails in > certain circumstance. Offline IMAP could potentially corrupt data when > hitting check-mail at the wrong time, etc. Let's not remember KMail1 as > being heaven. It was certainly not. > > To address those issues KMail2 was created, that it is not (yet) fully > working is a fact, but don't say KMail1 always worked nicely, if that would > have been the case, it would not have been rewritten. > > Best,
Well I know that KMail2 was created to fix many issues, though I only use POP3 and SMTP so I was never hit by the IMAP issues of which there were some quite serious as you point out. Yet indeed I have no clue what the original poster uses. >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
