Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Luigi Toscano <[email protected]> > wrote:
>> But it's not the same situation. >> For what I remember, even if I was not an active contributor at that time, >> the >> new svn repository basically matched the content of the old one; moreover, >> the >> structure was a bit different at that time. This is not the case with git, >> where for example we would lose the content of unmaintaned (which is somehow >> hidden). What if someone would like to continue a project from there? > > They will need to migrate the old project to Git first, before being > able to make new commits to it. Thank you, this is perfectly acceptable. > It is not necessary to keep WebSVN alive to still allow the repository > content to be accessed. >> Also, even if non migrated projects in extragear and playground will be kept, >> the lost of history does not sound good (same reasons as before, also because >> it would make it impossible to solve problems related, for example, with >> licensing or relicensing, should they arise). > > No loss of history will occur, the full Subversion repository will > remain accessible via svn://. > [...] > > In case it was not already clear - svn:// access will be the only part > of Subversion which will be retained. > (Translation infrastructure is not affected by the above). Thank you; this means can you please update the migration document, removing the line "Close down of svn.kde.org. All extragear / playground projects still in svn will be 'archived' with loss of history.", as it seems to not be the case? Ciao -- Luigi
