On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Luigi Toscano <[email protected]> wrote: > Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:52:32PM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >>>> http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown >> >> Hi Oswald, >> >>>> >>> this whole thing ignores that svn is still simply the better option for >>> certain types of content - multimedia data in particular. >> >> Correct. We'll keep an eye on Git's progress in this area to see if >> anything workable comes up. >> If nothing does, we will adjust our plans as needed at the appropriate >> stage of the plan. > > Does the rollback plan include also troubles or problems or bad feedback from > translators? The plan only says:
The plan has been fully discussed with the translations co-ordinator, Albert Astals Cid. > > "The only exception are the translations. These will continue to happen via > subversion, but this will use the gitolite software as backend, in any case, > this will result in only minor changes for translators." > > Can you please elaborate more about those changes? I haven't seen no > discussion on the relevant mailing list. I miss last Akademy as well, so maybe > it was discussed there, but it would be better to know what's going on before > it's too late The change will consist of a single, one-time execution of "svn switch --relocate" which translators will need to perform if they make commits. This was not discussed at Akademy, but on IRC in #kde-sysadmin. > > >> >>> of course git could be hacked to Not Suck for such content (fully >>> functional shallow and narrow clones, lazy fetching, etc.), but to my >>> knowledge this has not happend yet (i make no claim to being fully >>> up-to-date). >> >> Regards, >> Ben >> > Regards, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin
