On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:52:32PM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown > this whole thing ignores that svn is still simply the better option for certain types of content - multimedia data in particular. of course git could be hacked to Not Suck for such content (fully functional shallow and narrow clones, lazy fetching, etc.), but to my knowledge this has not happend yet (i make no claim to being fully up-to-date).
- Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Nicolás Alvarez
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Nicolás Alvarez
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Ingo Malchow
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Nicolás Álvarez
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown David Faure
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Oliver Henshaw
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Ben Cooksley
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutd... Luigi Toscano
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure ... Ben Cooksley
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastruct... Luigi Toscano
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Ben Cooksley
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Luigi Toscano
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutd... Ben Cooksley
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure ... Albert Astals Cid
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Urs Wolfer
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Ben Cooksley
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Urs Wolfer
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Burkhard Lück
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Ben Cooksley
- Re: Plans for SVN infrastructure shutdown Marco Martin
