https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452758
--- Comment #29 from Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #27)
> But this also handles DW_FORM_rnglistx and DW_FORM_loclistx.
> Shouldn't setup_cu_bases also handle these?
And that is what patch4 does.
> And if so, should we have an skip_Form_contents function that can be used in
> both places?
Still a good idea, but not super urgent.
Found once small issue with patch4:
+ case DW_FORM_rnglistx:
+ case DW_FORM_loclistx:
+ return VARSZ_FORM;
+ return VARSZ_FORM;
Removed the duplicate return and pushed as:
commit d19bbdf1200685ddbb6976cf915fba25f2097162
Author: Luboš Luňák <l.lu...@centrum.cz>
Date: Tue Apr 19 12:20:16 2022 +0200
read dwarf5 DW_FORM_rnglistx and DW_FORM_loclistx
The .debug_rnglists/.debug_loclists sections first have a list of offsets
and then a list of the actual data that those offsets point to.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
