https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452758

--- Comment #28 from Lubos Lunak <l.lu...@kde.org> ---
> But this also handles DW_FORM_rnglistx and DW_FORM_loclistx.
> Shouldn't setup_cu_bases also handle these?

The 2nd patch does that. The 7 patches should be applied in the order they are
attached. You appear to be applying them based on their subject line, but those
got meaningless as I was adding and updating the patches and I didn't realize
somebody might look at those (I don't know if I'd ever submitted several
patches as actual patches before).

> And if so, should we have an skip_Form_contents function that can be used in 
> both places?

I don't know what you mean, I see no need for such a function.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to