On 22.12.2011 13:36, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > The main problem under Ubuntu, regarding OJ NB (1.4.3?) is connected to file > chooser dialog: too long and the arrow for dropping down menu is not visible. > This bug comes out only if you choose "Open.." menu and go to "File" option . > If you follow other ways (like using directly "Open file..." menu) it works > fine.
i just observed the following. try File->Open File first and all other variants later. suddenly the dropdown field behaves as it is supposed to. i will give it some more love after the family days but obviously it is a minor "how the panel is initialized" issue. > I suspect that this bug came out (at least in Ubuntu) after adding "All > supported file" option - this plugin reads all supported extension and writes > on the menu option. The problem is that this plugin reads also world file > extension (.tfw, .jgw, etc) and recognize them as "supported file too" - no > way to open a jgw as it is a text file! i didn't see jgw in the list. anyway if it is in all supported some file factory claims to open it. > I added a screenshot about this bug. > > An extra information about this bug > > - The long file chooser dialog is alway there. I tested with Iced tea 1.6, > Iced tea 1.7 and Oracle Jre 1.6. Iced Tea 1.6 is the java machine used by > Ubuntu in the last distros. With all OJ NB I have installed in my computer > (201111, 201111 where did you do so? > - the arrow to drop down menu is not visible with Iced Tea (1.6 or 1.7) and > Oracle java depending to the version of OJ > Likely I have some testing OJ NB of September where I localized that > a) this latter bug was present on version OpenJUMP-20111106-r2511 Nov 6th > b) It was disappeared on version OpenJUMP-2011111 (I have no serial number, I > found written "testing version"), Nov 11th > c) it was again on version OpenJUMP-20111113-r2528 Nov. 13 > In the last version of NB OpenJUMP-20111217-r2552 the "long menu" is there > but the arrow is visible this is a clear trunk issue. 1.4.2 does not have "all supported" .. so 1.4.2 is a candidate for osgeo. we should set the start script permissions to executable though. > > Now all my impression are only empiric. I did no variation on OJ core to see > other possibilities. I ask Ede to make an experimental version oj OJ NB > (December) and see, on Ubuntu, if this bug of file chooser dialog is > connected to the option "all supported file". let me fix it in january as described above > Now, on my opinion this is not really a big bug. With "regular" monitor, user > can easily use the "long menu" and it is always possible to drop down even > with no arrow. But it becomes a big problem if you use laptop with small > screen (11" or similar) does it? i tried it in a virtual machine and went to 640x480 and ok the arrow is missing and there is no visual clue that there is an all files option but clicking into the field also opens the dropdown and cursor buttons or muse scroll work fine ;) > - I didn't see other evident bugs. I would vote to add OJ NB, as a special > version OJ, to OSGeo-Live 5.5 release. But we should correct this bug, > probably hidden at the moment "all supported files" (if this is the origin of > the bug) > i am kind of in favor of a snapshot as well. i could beat the 7th january deadline i guess. > - On the other hand, if we add OJ NB on OSGeo-Live, we should make a new > real. of OJ. There are some important modifications between last NB and > 1.4.2, that make "OJ 1.5" more worth to use. For instance the new Horizontal > position on label option made by Michael. Or the new "conglomerates" of > different plugin in the "Tool" menu (Union/dissolve, etc). But we probably > have no resource, time, etc to do in few days (maybe in few months), not even > (more important) to test any new/old bugs however we call it, let's go recent. > > - It is probably better to use OJ 1.4.2 on OSGeo-Live 5.5 without thinking > to make a Marry Christmas version of Openjump in few days > > When I have time I will do other tests. Right now everything seems fine > (except "long menu") > thanks for the heads up. my take is that this voluntary project does not have to be perfect, even if put in a wide scale distribution. if it starts and is generally usable people can get to know it and report bugs and/or get a more recent version if they like it. .. happy holidays ede > > > > > *Da:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *A:* Stefan Steiniger <[email protected]> > *Cc:* jump devel <[email protected]>; Michaël Michaud > <[email protected]>; Landon Blake <[email protected]> > *Inviato:* Mercoledì 21 Dicembre 2011 16:05 > *Oggetto:* Re: [JPP-Devel] What version of applications should we be > installing on OSGeo-Live 5.5? - openjump > > no sorry. i am a bit short on time lately. so i am not able to do anything > bigger. i couldn't lay a hand on the file dialog so far. > > Peppe: Could you check 1.4.2 on linux again and come back if you find show > stoppers? Maybe we should pimp 1.4.2 a little and distribute a 1.4.3 interim > version with the most important bugfixes from trunk? > > ..regards ede > > > On 21.12.2011 15:38, Stefan Steiniger wrote: >> Hi Michael, Edgar >> >> sorry for my late response. >> But I am not sure if we should use 1.4.2 as the MacOSX bug is not fixed in >> there. On the other hand its a Ubuntu distribution... was that all ok on >> Ubuntu with respect to saving data? (and only the >> file-choser-is-to-long-bug?) >> >> Edgar do you know more? >> In that case its fine. >> >> cheers from Germany >> stefan >> >> Am 18.12.11 17:31, schrieb Michaël Michaud: >>> Hi Cameron, >>> >>> Thanks for the remainder, and thanks to give OpenJUMP a chance to be >>> included in the next OSGeo-Live 5.5 release >>> We should now include OpenJUMP 1.4.2 (sept. 2011) in this distribution >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP/1.4.2/ >>> >>> I also transfer to Edgar Soldin, who has a better experience about >>> OpenJUMP under Linux and installation scripts. >>> >>> Is something needed before january 7th ? >>> Landon, Stefan, Ede, anybody volunteer to help checking distribution ? >>> >>> Michaël >>> >>> >>>> Stefan, Landon, Michaël >>>> , >>>> >>>> As you are our point of contact for openjump could you please let me >>>> know which version of openjump should be installed on our next >>>> OSGeo-Live 5.5 release. >>>> We previously had version 1.4.0.1 of openjump installed on the last >>>> OSGeo-Live 5.0 release. >>>> >>>> We track versions here: >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdGIzd0VLLTBpQVJuNVlHMlBWSDhKLXc&hl=en_GB#gid=8 >>>> >>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdGIzd0VLLTBpQVJuNVlHMlBWSDhKLXc&hl=en_GB#gid=8> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 17/12/2011 7:11 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>>> Over the Christmas/New Year break, we intend to start the OSGeo-Live >>>>> build process for the next 5.5 release and would like to know which >>>>> version of each application we should include on OSGeo-Live. >>>> >>>>> For the application(s) which you are responsible for, could you >>>>> please email me with the version that you expect should be installed. >>>>> If you will be changing the version of your application, could you >>>>> please start thinking about updating the installers script. >>>> >>>>> Our key milestones are: >>>>> * 7 Jan 2012: Feature Freeze (installer scripts in place) >>>>> * 4 Feb 2012: OSGeo-Live to UAT (all bugs out of installers and >>>>> applications) >>>>> * 25 Feb 2012: Final image sent to the printers >>>> >>>> >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Write once. Port to many. > Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create > new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the > Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Write once. Port to many. > Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create > new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the > Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
