Hi,

Kosmo benefits an important developper team, and I would have liked a 
better cooperation between OpenJUMP and Kosmo.
I think the main problem is that kosmo started its development from an 
old version of Jump, and when the first opensource version of kosmo was 
published, jump and openjump had already made good progresses.
Now, it would be a lot of work to merge all openJUMP improvments into 
kosmo (or the opposite).
I think OpenJUMP lacks development power to proceed to a big change like 
integrating all kosmo's improvements or merging openjump goodies into 
kosmo's core.
The  way kosmo is driven maybe another difficulty  (highlighted by 
Stefan), and language and code comments may be another difficulty (I did 
not check how kosmo code is documented).
Other comments from OJ's active developpers ?

my 2 cents

Michaël

Stefan Steiniger a écrit :

>Hei Peppe,
>
>the problem is simply that KOSMOs development is driven by project needs 
>and that they focus on a spannish user community.
>
>On the one hand, there is the advantage if massive improvements and man 
>power by Kosmo. On the other I am not sure if this would be a good idea 
>if we allow a project driven development. Further we work on OJ if we 
>find time. So it would be hard for us if a development schedule is 
>introduced.
>
>so, more or less we can not really work together because we have 
>different interests in the development - only exchanging sources and 
>functionality would be possible. Or where would one see how we could do 
>that? This topic would also need comments by Intevation/LatLon and 
>SkyJUMP... but only if other volunteers aggree in a common project.
>
>my 2 cents.
>Stefan
>
>Giuseppe Aruta schrieb:
>  
>
>>Hi all
>>I recently started to collaborate with  the Kosmo SAIG project, 
>>translating the software in Italian.
>>I use both software with my geological project.I belive that the 2 
>>software together have  a strong potentiality. I would like to find a 
>>common area for the development of both "brothers", starting a  common 
>>project. I read from SS blog that there was an idea about it some times ago.
>>What is your opinion?Do (did)  you have any idea about it?
>>Thanks for your attention
>> 
>>Peppe
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Inviato da Yahoo! Mail 
>><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mailuk/taglines/isp/control/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=52437/*http://it.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html>.
>> 
>>
>>Il servizio di posta con lo spazio illimitato.
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>>http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>    
>>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>_______________________________________________
>Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>
>  
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to