my opinion:
>Now, I still consider buoy as a very cool library, but I can see that >adoption by java community is very slow, and you are right, adding such >a library for only one plugin is not worthwhile. >Some scenarios for the future of buoy in OJ are : >- let buoy and simple query as it is (+200 ko does not hurt much) > > yep - I agree >- remove buoy + simple query from the core (I would not have any problem >with that, there are now some good stuff from vivid for querying, even >if some queries are easier to do with simplequery, it can always be >delivered as an extension) > > nope.. s.q. has some advantages over the built-in queries >- rewrite simple query to remove all buoy dependencies (probably not too >hard, but also not too high in my priority list) > > possible, but i think as well that it has low priority btw.: Jons GUI functions are nice, but the simple query gui is to complex from my point of view but if Paul think that is a simple thing for him to change to an on lib, i won't object stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
