Am I right in assuming that this plugin would be redundant if the JS
was loaded at the bottom of the page?

I'm asking because several of my sites, I don't put JS files in the
head for performance reasons.


On Sep 3, 11:15 am, Mika Tuupola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Little something I worked on sunday.
>
> http://www.appelsiini.net/projects/lazyload
>
> Plugin which enables deferred loading (lazy loading) of images. In
> other words, images which are below the fold (far down the page not
> visible in browser) are not loaded before user scrolls down. This
> plugin should be useful with long pages which have lot of photo
> content. For example photoblogs.
>
> Demo pages is available. You might want to use Firebug or liveHTTP
> headers to better see what is happening.
>
> http://www.appelsiini.net/projects/lazyload/enabled.html
>
> --
> Mika Tuupolahttp://www.appelsiini.net/

Reply via email to