Am I right in assuming that this plugin would be redundant if the JS was loaded at the bottom of the page?
I'm asking because several of my sites, I don't put JS files in the head for performance reasons. On Sep 3, 11:15 am, Mika Tuupola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Little something I worked on sunday. > > http://www.appelsiini.net/projects/lazyload > > Plugin which enables deferred loading (lazy loading) of images. In > other words, images which are below the fold (far down the page not > visible in browser) are not loaded before user scrolls down. This > plugin should be useful with long pages which have lot of photo > content. For example photoblogs. > > Demo pages is available. You might want to use Firebug or liveHTTP > headers to better see what is happening. > > http://www.appelsiini.net/projects/lazyload/enabled.html > > -- > Mika Tuupolahttp://www.appelsiini.net/