Thanks for checking it out. I was thinking about this last night. I thought about maybe writing something non-jQuery so that the page would hold off loading images until the page had been loaded to the bottom. But then, I don't want my guys doing that.
I might just make an exception and put jQuery in the header, but I'm fairly against that idea for the anal reasons I mentioned before. :-) On Sep 6, 3:06 pm, Mika Tuupola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 6, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Dan Atkinson wrote: > > > Am I right in assuming that this plugin would be redundant if the JS > > was loaded at the bottom of the page? > > > I'm asking because several of my sites, I don't put JS files in the > > head for performance reasons. > > Quick test shows this seems to be the case. Images are quicker to > load than javascript at the bottom of the page. Situation might be > different in a slower host thought. > > http://www.appelsiini.net/projects/lazyload/enabled_bottom.html > > -- > Mika Tuupolahttp://www.appelsiini.net/
