On Sep 6, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Dan Atkinson wrote:
Am I right in assuming that this plugin would be redundant if the JS was loaded at the bottom of the page? I'm asking because several of my sites, I don't put JS files in the head for performance reasons.
Quick test shows this seems to be the case. Images are quicker to load than javascript at the bottom of the page. Situation might be different in a slower host thought.
http://www.appelsiini.net/projects/lazyload/enabled_bottom.html -- Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/
