lianetm commented on code in PR #18737:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18737#discussion_r1954578166
##########
clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/ConsumerMembershipManagerTest.java:
##########
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ public void
testSameAssignmentReconciledAgainWithMissingTopic() {
// stay in RECONCILING state, since an unresolved topic is assigned
membershipManager.onHeartbeatSuccess(createConsumerGroupHeartbeatResponse(assignment1,
membershipManager.memberId()));
assertEquals(MemberState.RECONCILING, membershipManager.state());
- membershipManager.poll(time.milliseconds());
+ membershipManager.maybeReconcile(true);
Review Comment:
Hey @frankvicky , is it maybe that you're trying to update the tests without
this change in place?
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18737#discussion_r1952918176
All this suggestion of updating the tests that do not need revocation is
based on that change. I tried it locally and the test passes with
maybeReconcile(false) as expected (good news!), just including the change from
the comment to short-circuit only if revocations are needed of course.
-- update
even with all this in place, we also need to address @junrao 's comment
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18737#discussion_r1953524086 but let's
follow-up on that one there
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
