Hi Michael, Surely, the bugs reported in this mail thread were in PsychoPath XPath engine. PsychoPath engine does claim conformance to the W3C XPath 2.0 test suite, and at the moment we do pass 100% of this test suite.
Incidentally, the issues highlighted in this mail thread with respect to certain XPath 2.0 F&O behaviors with PsychoPath engine, are not covered in the current W3C XPath 2.0 test suite. Also to mention, we do regression of the W3C XPath 2.0 test suite (our implementation of this is located at, the Eclipse Source Editing site) whenever we introduce any changes to the PsychoPath XPath 2.0 engine, to make sure we're not breaking any existing functionality of PsychoPath engine with any new changes. On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Michael Glavassevich <mrgla...@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > That's true, assuming PsychoPath is being tested that way. Have never really > looked at what goes on in Eclipse-land. Mukul should know though. > > Thanks. > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Technologies and WAS Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com > E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org
