Hey Guys,

Seems like the last couple of bugs relate to the XPath 2 engine specifically.   
If PsycoPath claims full conformance, then the deficiencies are really in the 
XPath 2 test suite.

-jOrGe W.

On May 24, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Mukul Gandhi wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>    I believe, the W3C's XML Schema 1.1 test suite has a significant
> coverage for XSD 1.1 assertions.
> 
> But I would agree, that <assertion> tests like those cited within this
> thread and probably some others as well could be added to W3C XSD 1.1
> test suite, for the reasons you've mentioned.
> 
> Probably, if someone like Sandy takes initiative to have such tests
> added to XSD 1.1 test suite, it would be great. I'm certainly willing
> to provide new tests like these, in the W3C XSD 1.1 test suite format.
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Michael Glavassevich
> <mrgla...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>> I'm curious what kind of coverage there is for assertions in the W3C's XML
>> Schema 1.1 test suite. If it were enhanced to cover more scenarios like this
>> one and others we've been discussing on this list lately it would help
>> improve interoperability.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Michael Glavassevich
>> XML Technologies and WAS Development
>> IBM Toronto Lab
>> E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
>> E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org

Reply via email to