dsmiley commented on code in PR #1243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1243#discussion_r1055728773


##########
solr/core/src/test-files/solr/solr.xml:
##########
@@ -35,11 +35,6 @@
     <int name="connTimeout">${connTimeout:15000}</int>
   </shardHandlerFactory>
 
-  <transientCoreCacheFactory name="transientCoreCacheFactory" 
class="TransientSolrCoreCacheFactoryDefault">

Review Comment:
   TransientCoreCache was pluggable.  I don't think this is the right pluggable 
thing, so I removed its plug-ability.  Instead, I think "SolrCores" is better 
suited to be pluggable.  In so doing, the default/base SolrCores doesn't have 
to know about transient cores, and is thus simpler to understand for nearly 
everyone.  Businesses like my employer (in the definite minority) can deal with 
it in a different way than previously.
   
   You propose a CoreFactory?  Today, cores are created in CoreContainer (as 
you know, I'm sure).  I'm trying to narrowly limit the scope of this PR to not 
be noticed by code that doesn't care about transient cores.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to