[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17505295#comment-17505295
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-16061:
-------------------------------------

I believe I addressed all remaining issues.
If there is a mistake/error, it would be in some tests that mistakenly assume 
that all solrClients are equivalent, when in some very small percentage of 
scenarios, there is some timing issue of which ZkStateReader in which client is 
being consulted.  When the original work was done, had an IntelliJ "structural 
replace" been done, I don't think such mistakes would have been made.  It's too 
tedious to review the massive PR on a file by file basis, although I've done 
some of it.  Some commit-by-commit that don't touch too many are useful; for 
example I just added a convenience method on 
MiniSolrCloudCluster.getZkStateReader which is wanted very often.  At this 
point, the tests pass!

> Decouple CloudSolrClient from ZkStateReader
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-16061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16061
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 9.0
>
>          Time Spent: 2h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Spinoff from SOLR-15342
> We need to decouple CloudSolrClient from Zookeeper, to prepare for a future 
> modularization of solrj. This should be targetet for 9.0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to