[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17485833#comment-17485833
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-15949:
------------------------------------
I think it may be a bit too much to flip to Java17 Azul and Alpine at the same
time :) If we do, we should keep publishing a debian variant (with JDK?)...
I see that to get e.g. a Temurin JRE we'd need to use multi-stage docker build
with JLink which then excludes official images.
Think I've said it before, I'd be willing to scrap official images and promote
use of "apache/solr" namespace on Docker Hub, then we gain full control over
our docker builds. But what would we miss out on?
PS: Would be interesting to explore packaging Solr as a native app with JLink
and shave off JRE modules we do not use. But I fear it will not be simple given
Jetty and lack of module system support in Solr.
> Use Java 17 in docker
> ---------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15949
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15949
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Docker
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 9.0
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I propose that our Docker image for Solr 9 use Java 17, the latest LTS
> release of Java. A change like this ought to only occur on a major version,
> and hence I propose doing it now.
> Dev list thread, "Propose Solr 9 *Docker* image use Java 17":
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rx490w221trqvxdzddv6tp2g411fxstk
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
