issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Support DocIdSetBuilder with partition bounds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support DocIdSetBuilder with partition bounds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support DocIdSetBuilder with partition bounds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support DocIdSetBuilder with partition bounds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support DocIdSetBuilder with partition bounds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support DocIdSetBuilder with partition bounds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support DocIdSetBuilder with partition bounds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support DocIdSetBuilder with partition bounds [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] FVH BaseFragmentsBuilder does not properly support colored pre/post tags [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Batch virtual calls from DefaultBulkScorer#scoreRange [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Batch virtual calls from DefaultBulkScorer#scoreRange [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Batch virtual calls from DefaultBulkScorer#scoreRange [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Batch virtual calls from DefaultBulkScorer#scoreRange [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Batch virtual calls from DefaultBulkScorer#scoreRange [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Utilize iterator and not approximation in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize iterator and not approximation in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize iterator and not approximation in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize iterator and not approximation in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize iterator and not approximation in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Enable -Xlint:path and -Xlint:-exports [LUCENE-10322] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Modify module descriptors to require core API dependencies and expose them transitively [LUCENE-10323] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Automatic cross-validation between the graph of modules and declared dependencies in gradle [LUCENE-10324] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Render javadocs of modules as proper modules [LUCENE-10326] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add sanity checks for the distribution [LUCENE-10307] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fully embrace the java module system [LUCENE-10255] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Achieve build system perfection (with progress) [LUCENE-9871] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Achieve build system perfection (with progress) [LUCENE-9871] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Consolidate java version numbers in one place and reuse them across build parts [LUCENE-10631] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Use gradle-opts-plugin to handle build and test-related options [LUCENE-9876] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Move stable bits of the build system under buildSrc to speed up initial gradle launches [LUCENE-9875] [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] How to support query cache in knn search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] How to support query cache in knn search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] How to support query cache in knn search [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Speed up NumericUtils#{subtract,add} [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up NumericUtils#{subtract,add} [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up NumericUtils#{subtract,add} [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up NumericUtils#{subtract,add} [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up NumericUtils#{subtract,add} [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up NumericUtils#{subtract,add} [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] ASF CI snapshot publishing fails occasionally with network failures [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] apache jenkins: Failed to save the JUnit test result [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Gradle builds slow to start [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Gradle builds slow to start [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove apache-rat dependency completely? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] More gradle cleanups [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Drop owasp tasks and plugins from the build [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Final Gradle plugins to Java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Final Gradle plugins to Java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Final Gradle plugins to Java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Final Gradle plugins to Java [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [Build] [DO NOT MERGE YET] Refactor validation-jar checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Build] [DO NOT MERGE YET] Refactor validation-jar checks [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Rewrote more Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrote more Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrote more Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrote more Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update created version major [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: populate missing job timeout-minutes, fail build if missing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: populate missing job timeout-minutes, fail build if missing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: populate missing job timeout-minutes, fail build if missing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: enable zizmor online checks at night [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable zizmor online checks at night [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable zizmor online checks at night [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: disable concurrency-limits lint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: disable concurrency-limits lint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: disable concurrency-limits lint [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] SOLR-13985: Bind to localhost interface by default [lucene-solr] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SOLR-13985: Bind to localhost interface by default [lucene-solr] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 10.0.0 to 10.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 10.0.0 to 10.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump jira from 3.8.0 to 3.10.5 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump jira from 3.8.0 to 3.10.5 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.31.6 to 1.31.7 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.31.6 to 1.31.7 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.13.2 to 0.14.1 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.13.2 to 0.14.1 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.81 to 0.82 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.81 to 0.82 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: configure dependabot cooldown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: configure dependabot cooldown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: configure dependabot cooldown [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Lucene icon in Intellij [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Lucene icon in Intellij [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Lucene icon in Intellij [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix manifest content on source/javadoc artifacts. [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages