issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Dynamic pruning for SORTED(_SET) fields with doc values skipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic pruning for SORTED(_SET) fields with doc values skipper [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add count() to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Test failure in TestDirectoryReader.testExecutorServicePartialFailure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestDirectoryReader.testExecutorServicePartialFailure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestDirectoryReader.testExecutorServicePartialFailure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestDirectoryReader.testExecutorServicePartialFailure [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Create a tool that prints an HNSW graph degree histogram [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a tool that prints an HNSW graph degree histogram [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native dot product in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use native vectorization in Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] BP Reordering Codec [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Expose MergeRateLimiter in runOnMergeFinished hook [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose MergeRateLimiter in runOnMergeFinished hook [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose MergeRateLimiter in runOnMergeFinished hook [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose MergeRateLimiter in runOnMergeFinished hook [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose MergeRateLimiter in runOnMergeFinished hook [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format from 1.32.0 to 1.33.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format from 1.32.0 to 1.33.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade snowball to 2d2e312df56f2ede014a4ffb3e91e6dea43c24be [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Can we remove `compress` option for quantized KNN vector indexing? [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Investigate potential HNSW merge improvement [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search old graphs during HNSW merging new graph building [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search old graphs during HNSW merging new graph building [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] eclipse: disable new "member of deprecated type not deprecated" diag [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] eclipse: disable new "member of deprecated type not deprecated" diag [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we rewrite/optimize the HNSW graph in 2nd pass? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we rewrite/optimize the HNSW graph in 2nd pass? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we rewrite/optimize the HNSW graph in 2nd pass? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we rewrite/optimize the HNSW graph in 2nd pass? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we rewrite/optimize the HNSW graph in 2nd pass? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] MMapDirectory sometimes "leaks" 1000s of maps [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add `count()` to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to FilterWeight [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [LUCENE-9410] German/French stemmers fail for common forms maux, gegrüßt, grüßend, schlummert [lucene-solr] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Create a read-only index that drops index files not needed for searching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a read-only index that drops index files not needed for searching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a read-only index that drops index files not needed for searching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a read-only index that drops index files not needed for searching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a read-only index that drops index files not needed for searching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a read-only index that drops index files not needed for searching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a read-only index that drops index files not needed for searching [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [Tessellator] Fix failure due to hole bridge being coplanar with polygon edge. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Tessellator] Fix failure due to hole bridge being coplanar with polygon edge. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] New JMH benchmark method - vdot8s that implement int8 dotProduct in C… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] New JMH benchmark method - vdot8s that implement int8 dotProduct in C… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] New JMH benchmark method - vdot8s that implement int8 dotProduct in C… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] New JMH benchmark method - vdot8s that implement int8 dotProduct in C… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] New JMH benchmark method - vdot8s that implement int8 dotProduct in C… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] New JMH benchmark method - vdot8s that implement int8 dotProduct in C… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] New JMH benchmark method - vdot8s that implement int8 dotProduct in C… [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Introduce optional access to backing vector values from the scorer [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages