issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `count()` to `FilterWeight` [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] How to support query cache in knn search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] support flat mode [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] support flat mode [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] UAX29URLEmailTokenizerImpl.jflex matches emails with commas and invalid periods in the local part [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix hidden range embedded in UAX29URLEmail grammar [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix hidden range embedded in UAX29URLEmail grammar [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AcceptDocs#cost() fully consumes iterator, invalidating any possible perf gain [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary getGraph() call [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix FuzzySet#createSetBasedOnMaxMemory to honor bytes not bits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FuzzySet#createSetBasedOnMaxMemory to honor bytes not bits [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecate some public FuzzySet methods ahead of removing them in a future release [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate some public FuzzySet methods ahead of removing them in a future release [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure that FilterXxx properly delegate to the decorated instances [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce AllGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Adaptive index mode [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive indexing mode for prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive indexing mode for prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive indexing mode for prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive indexing mode for prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive indexing mode for prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive indexing mode for prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add comment in SegmentTermsEnum#seekCeil/Exact. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comment in SegmentTermsEnum#seekCeil/Exact. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Unable to Tessellate shape for valid Polygon [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Unable to Tessellate shape for valid Polygon [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] MergedByteVectorValues is missing increasing `lastOrd` when advancing. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MergedByteVectorValues is missing increasing `lastOrd` when advancing. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MergedByteVectorValues is missing increasing `lastOrd` when advancing. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix mergedbytevectorvalues lastord [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [QueryCache] Use RamUsageEstimator instead of defaulting to 1024 bytes for non-accountable query size [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide helper utility API to compute CRC32 across concurrent (map/reduce) chunks [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Expose MergeRateLimiter in runOnMergeFinished hook [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose MergeRateLimiter in runOnMergeFinished hook [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: pin unpinned actions ref [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: pin unpinned actions ref [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use Google's maven central mirror on github runners [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Google's maven central mirror on github runners [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Google's maven central mirror on github runners [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Google's maven central mirror on github runners [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Google's maven central mirror on github runners [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Google's maven central mirror on github runners [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Google's maven central mirror on github runners [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Align vectors on disk for optimal performance on ARM CPUs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Highlighter QueryPhraseMap boost overridden due to conflicting query expansion [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we add bfloat16 support for HNSW? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] ToParentBlockJoinSortField does not handle missing values correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ToParentBlockJoinSortField does not handle missing values correctly [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages