issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Bring new quantized format inline with old quantized format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bring new quantized format inline with old quantized format [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene104PostingsFormat currently block size is 256 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104PostingsFormat currently block size is 256 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.6 to 3.27.7 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.6 to 3.27.7 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestLucene60FieldInfosFormat.testMergeStability [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestLucene60FieldInfosFormat.testMergeStability [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestLucene60FieldInfosFormat.testMergeStability [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] RFC: SPANN Vector Format for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SPANN (Disk Resident HNSW-IVF) Implementation [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cluster Based ANN Vector Search for Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use expectThrows for expected exceptions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use expectThrows for expected exceptions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use expectThrows for expected exceptions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use expectThrows for expected exceptions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Enabled cfs for BaseIndexFileFormatTestCase.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enabled cfs for BaseIndexFileFormatTestCase.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enabled cfs for BaseIndexFileFormatTestCase.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enabled cfs for BaseIndexFileFormatTestCase.java [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Build: Ensure reproduction line can be copy & pasted into terminal [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: Ensure reproduction line can be copy & pasted into terminal [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: Ensure reproduction line can be copy & pasted into terminal [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: Ensure reproduction line can be copy & pasted into terminal [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: Ensure reproduction line can be copy & pasted into terminal [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] `TopFieldCollectorManager`: Support thread safe [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] `TopFieldCollectorManager`: Support thread safe [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] `TopFieldCollectorManager`: Support thread safe [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] `TopFieldCollectorManager`: Support thread safe [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] `TopFieldCollectorManager`: Support thread safe [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Blended queries with boolean rewrite can result in inconsistent scores [LUCENE-9269] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix docFreq in score calculation after rewrite of boolean query consisting of blended query and boosted term query [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk score hnsw diversity check [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Use bulk scoring more places for HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use bulk scoring more places for HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use bulk scoring more places for HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use bulk scoring more places for HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use bulk scoring more places for HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Switch to a fixed CFS threshold [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollectorManager is not thread-safe despite claiming "thread-safe internal states" [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix/fvh boost issue [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] XXE (XML External Entity) Vulnerability in XML Parsing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] XXE (XML External Entity) Vulnerability in XML Parsing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] XXE (XML External Entity) Vulnerability in XML Parsing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] BufferedChecksum JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BufferedChecksum JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BufferedChecksum JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BufferedChecksum JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BufferedChecksum JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] TestRescoreTopNQuery: Don't flush per document [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TestRescoreTopNQuery: Don't flush per document [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Failure in TestRescoreTopNQuery.testLateInteractionQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Failure in TestRescoreTopNQuery.testLateInteractionQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Failure in TestRescoreTopNQuery.testLateInteractionQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Failure in TestRescoreTopNQuery.testLateInteractionQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Failure in TestRescoreTopNQuery.testLateInteractionQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Failure in TestRescoreTopNQuery.testLateInteractionQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Better encapsulate locking logic in HnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Better encapsulate locking logic in HnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages