issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.14.10 to 0.14.14 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.3 to 5.0.4 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.3 to 5.0.4 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.36.2 to 1.37.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.36.2 to 1.37.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-python from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-python from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Allow TermsEnum to express a preference for seekExact to FrozenBufferedUpdates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow TermsEnum to express a preference for seekExact to FrozenBufferedUpdates [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix FVH boost issue (#15442) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FVH boost issue (#15442) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FVH boost issue (#15442) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FVH boost issue (#15442) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Adding Builder pattern in MMapDirectory.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Adding Builder pattern in MMapDirectory.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Adding Builder pattern in MMapDirectory.java [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use a more coarse-grained competitive iterator for skipper-based numeric sorts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a more coarse-grained competitive iterator for skipper-based numeric sorts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a more coarse-grained competitive iterator for skipper-based numeric sorts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a more coarse-grained competitive iterator for skipper-based numeric sorts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add support for writing full-precision vector file in QuantizedVectorWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added support for writing empty full-precision vector files [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added support for writing empty full-precision vector files [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added support for writing empty full-precision vector files [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert "Don't run changelog verifier on draft PRs (#14685)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "Don't run changelog verifier on draft PRs (#14685)" [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Switch some of the precommit/ validation tasks to pre-commit [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch some of the precommit/ validation tasks to pre-commit [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch some of the precommit/ validation tasks to pre-commit [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch some of the precommit/ validation tasks to pre-commit [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch some of the precommit/ validation tasks to pre-commit [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch some of the precommit/ validation tasks to pre-commit [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch some of the precommit/ validation tasks to pre-commit [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix javadoc description error (#15619) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix javadoc description error [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Minor refactor in SegmentTermsEnum.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor refactor in SegmentTermsEnum.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor refactor in SegmentTermsEnum.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor refactor in SegmentTermsEnum.java [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.2.1 to 9.3.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Bring new quantized format inline with old quantized format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bring new quantized format inline with old quantized format [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add validation to prevent zero vectors in KNN fields [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Temporal Merge Policy for time-series data [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene104PostingsFormat currently block size is 256 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104PostingsFormat currently block size is 256 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SegmentTermsEnumFrame: avoid unnecessary array allocations that waste memory [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.6 to 3.27.7 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.6 to 3.27.7 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene84RWCodec to cache CompoundFormat instance [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestLucene60FieldInfosFormat.testMergeStability [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestLucene60FieldInfosFormat.testMergeStability [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestLucene60FieldInfosFormat.testMergeStability [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow for different query bit sizes for asymmetric quantized vector indices [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] RFC: SPANN Vector Format for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages