issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Test failure in TestDirectoryReader.testExecutorServicePartialFailure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestDirectoryReader.testExecutorServicePartialFailure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestDirectoryReader.testExecutorServicePartialFailure [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 4.7.1 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 4.7.1 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 6.8.0 to 7.1.4 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 6.8.0 to 7.1.4 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 5.0.0 to 6.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 5.0.0 to 6.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-python from 6.0.0 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-python from 6.0.0 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.83 to 0.85 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.83 to 0.85 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.83 to 0.85 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.14.2 to 0.14.6 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.14.2 to 0.14.6 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.14.2 to 0.14.6 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.32.1 to 1.34.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.32.1 to 1.34.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] SOLR-14726: Initial draft of a new quickstart guide [lucene-solr] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SOLR-14726: Initial draft of a new quickstart guide [lucene-solr] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SOLR-14726: Initial draft of a new quickstart guide [lucene-solr] via GitHub
• [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update TermStates.java to remove deferred lambda in TermStates.get [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary sorting and instantiations in readMapOfStrings [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] `TestLucene90DocValuesFormat.testSparseNumericBlocksOfVariousBitsPerValue` test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `TestLucene90DocValuesFormat.testSparseNumericBlocksOfVariousBitsPerValue` test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `TestLucene90DocValuesFormat.testSparseNumericBlocksOfVariousBitsPerValue` test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `TestLucene90DocValuesFormat.testSparseNumericBlocksOfVariousBitsPerValue` test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `TestLucene90DocValuesFormat.testSparseNumericBlocksOfVariousBitsPerValue` test failure [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 8.0.0 to 8.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 8.0.0 to 8.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert required SegmentInfos min version in header check in readCommit to continue binary compatibility with 8.x indexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert required SegmentInfos min version in header check in readCommit to continue binary compatibility with 8.x indexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert required SegmentInfos min version in header check in readCommit to continue binary compatibility with 8.x indexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert required SegmentInfos min version in header check in readCommit to continue binary compatibility with 8.x indexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert required SegmentInfos min version in header check in readCommit to continue binary compatibility with 8.x indexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert required SegmentInfos min version in header check in readCommit to continue binary compatibility with 8.x indexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert required SegmentInfos min version in header check in readCommit to continue binary compatibility with 8.x indexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert required SegmentInfos min version in header check in readCommit to continue binary compatibility with 8.x indexes [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Need QueryParser support for BooleanQuery.minNrShouldMatch [LUCENE-466] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Need QueryParser support for BooleanQuery.minNrShouldMatch [LUCENE-466] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Need QueryParser support for BooleanQuery.minNrShouldMatch [LUCENE-466] [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Reading SegmentInfo and FieldInfo Map and Set fields perform unecessary sorting and object creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reading SegmentInfo and FieldInfo Map and Set fields perform unecessary sorting and object creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reading SegmentInfo and FieldInfo Map and Set fields perform unecessary sorting and object creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reading SegmentInfo and FieldInfo Map and Set fields perform unecessary sorting and object creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reading SegmentInfo and FieldInfo Map and Set fields perform unecessary sorting and object creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reading SegmentInfo and FieldInfo Map and Set fields perform unecessary sorting and object creation [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterIndexInput and FilterIndexOutput override the behavior of the instance that they decorate [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Typo in the error message [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Typo in the error message [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FilterWeight should delegate count() [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] `TestBlockJoin.testScoreMode` test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `TestBlockJoin.testScoreMode` test failure [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speed up slow LegacyBaseDocValuesFormatTestCase tests (fixes #1544) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up slow LegacyBaseDocValuesFormatTestCase tests (fixes #1544) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up slow LegacyBaseDocValuesFormatTestCase tests (fixes #1544) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up slow LegacyBaseDocValuesFormatTestCase tests (fixes #1544) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] minor change: code cleanup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor change: code cleanup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor change: code cleanup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor change: code cleanup [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `PointRangeQuery` for intra-segment concurrency with segment-level `DocIdSet` caching [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backporting Adding support for passing an ExecutorService into DirectoryReader.open() to enable concurrent segment reader initialization into branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backporting Adding support for passing an ExecutorService into DirectoryReader.open() to enable concurrent segment reader initialization into branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] BaseLucene80DocValuesFormatTestCase.testNumericFieldJumpTables is way too slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BaseLucene80DocValuesFormatTestCase.testNumericFieldJumpTables is way too slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BaseLucene80DocValuesFormatTestCase.testNumericFieldJumpTables is way too slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BaseLucene80DocValuesFormatTestCase.testNumericFieldJumpTables is way too slow [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] TestVectorUtilSupport increase delta for larger vector sizes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TestVectorUtilSupport increase delta for larger vector sizes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TestVectorUtilSupport increase delta for larger vector sizes [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FastVectorHighlighter loses boost values in phrase expansion and nested queries [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix segment-specific TermInSetQuery rewrites thrashing caching policy [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix segment-specific TermInSetQuery rewrites thrashing caching policy [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] De-dup raw vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] De-dup raw vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] De-dup raw vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [WIP] Concurrent merging with join set algorithm [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Concurrent merging with join set algorithm [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Concurrent merging with join set algorithm [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Concurrent merging with join set algorithm [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Concurrent merging with join set algorithm [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make MergingHnswGraphBuilder stable; fixes #15438 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make MergingHnswGraphBuilder stable; fixes #15438 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make MergingHnswGraphBuilder stable; fixes #15438 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make MergingHnswGraphBuilder stable; fixes #15438 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make MergingHnswGraphBuilder stable; fixes #15438 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] MergingHnswGraphBuilder is unstable [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MergingHnswGraphBuilder is unstable [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MergingHnswGraphBuilder is unstable [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MergingHnswGraphBuilder is unstable [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads exceeding max file handles. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads exceeding max file handles. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads exceeding max file handles. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads exceeding max file handles. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads exceeding max file handles. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads exceeding max file handles. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads exceeding max file handles. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads exceeding max file handles. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Collectors to re-order segments for non-exhaustive searches [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix flaky TestParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix flaky TestParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Handling concurrent search in QueryProfiler [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix QueryPhraseMap.markTerminal() boost override due to conflicting query expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix QueryPhraseMap.markTerminal() boost override due to conflicting query expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix QueryPhraseMap.markTerminal() boost override due to conflicting query expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix QueryPhraseMap.markTerminal() boost override due to conflicting query expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix QueryPhraseMap.markTerminal() boost override due to conflicting query expansion [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages