James Sutherland wrote:
> The approach you seem to advocate is "let companies do WTF they want, and
> to hell with people's rights".
I'm not sure where this started, but it looks to me like both
sides are either arguing for the extreme, or accusing the other of
arguing for the extreme.
Let's go for a middle ground here, hey? Something like 'companies
are entitled to have trustworthy employees, and employees are entitled
to have trustworthy companies'
And maybe then start arguing about what to do when an employee/company
proves untrustworthy.
> That's the whole point: this is NOT a case of letting a complete stranger
> use your system.
Bull Feathers. :)
You've seen a resume and read a handful of references. This hardly
qualifies the person as no longer a stranger. My parents run a small
business - it's HARD, bringing in a new staff member.
> Yes - a lot of companies export work to countries with lax laws, since
> it's cheaper that way. The ethics of this are rather questionable, but
> that's another issue...
New Zealand is hardly a country with lax labour laws!
Jenn V.
--
"Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture
you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jenn Vesperman http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/
_______________________________________________
issues mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
