On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 03:47:43PM -0800, Jen Hamilton wrote:
> There's no reason to argue N2H2's effectiveness or in-effectiveness in
> this newsgroup. The issue is censorship, not N2H2.
I'm against censorship. I'm against filtering software because a) (see
the first sentence of this paragraph) and b) I don't think it's an
effective solution. If we were only allowed to discuss one thing at a
time, you might have a point, but this is a discussion list. Discussions
evolve over time.
> Are you really resorting to slandering my company's product in order to
> prove your point?
Show me where I slandered your product. Keep in mind that you're looking
for a point in that email where I made *false* statements about the
product. That's what slander is; don't confuse slander with criticism. I
simply provided links to independent reports on your product. If you have
evidence that shows those reviews are inaccurate, by all means present it.
> N2H2 serves over 11,000 schools covering over 9 million students,
> so for every dissatisfied customer, there are hundreds or thousands more
> satisfied ones.
I'm very happy for them.
--
Aaron Malone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Clothes make the man.
System Administrator Naked people have little or
Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. no influence on society."
http://www.semo.net -- Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
issues mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
