> We don't want to prevent people from legitimately solving the > problem themselves. But we want /our/ way of doing it protected, > at least until we've got the reasonable reward for our labout. > (yeah, 'our'. I count chewing it over with him while theoretically > watching 'Buffy' to be work.) > > So .. is it wrong for us to investigate patents/copyright/whatever? Exactly... Facing a similar problem here, as he would like to *eventually* make this free, but need to make a living with the skills that he has in the meantime. So, he's thinking of keeping it 'patented' for 2-3 renewal periods (~8-12 years) and after that, release it to the public. -nicole (and karl) ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of A... Nicole Zimmerman
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of A... Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of A... Andross
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of A... Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of A... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of A... Jenn V.
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of A... Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of A... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of Amazon) Jenn V.
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of Amazo... Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of Amazo... Nicole Zimmerman
- Re: [issues] Patents (was: RMS boycott of Amazon) franzoni