Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 1999 00:20:45 -0400, Steve Kudlak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >Without teyting to be mean. Lawyer? Uh, Why? ZPlease explain it is
> >almost impossible to legislate, legalisze or do such things
> >expecially if we are taliking about thesemse.org ...
>
> There are a _lot_ of laws that apply to "adult" content that have to
> be closely observed. Anyone who distributes pornography, and
> especially obscenity, has to be very careful to avoid serious civil
> and criminal liability. Without a lawyer, you might not even be aware
> that you're distributing pornography or obscenity. The definitions of
> pornography and obscenity are not easy to understand or apply.
>
> Kelly
>
> ************
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
I can understand it is a difficult issue. But withopugt trying to flame, it
seems like fear mongering. No me if I get a linux up I might put up say
pictures of women who hasd "too many muscles". I wonder what theme people who
say about that. Evem silyy pix like:
http://memebers.tripod.com/~estelmann/lifts.thm
and see ehat people think. ANd how they react. The parties are all fully
cloted. Didn't check the rest of the site. By the way does the use of above
links throw people on is it hardcore "Hypertext" that is the problem.
Have Fun,
Sends Steve
P.S. CounterExample sems to work well. And it is hard for people to say: "Well
I can rattled your catagories, but you can't rattle mine..."
************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
