Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3033#discussion_r96421185
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/scala/batch/sql/JoinITCase.scala
 ---
    @@ -372,9 +372,163 @@ class JoinITCase(
         val table = 
CollectionDataSets.getSmall3TupleDataSet(env).toTable(tEnv).as('a1, 'a2, 'a3)
         tEnv.registerTable("A", table)
     
    -    val sqlQuery1 = "SELECT * FROM A CROSS JOIN (SELECT count(*) FROM A 
HAVING count(*) < 0)"
    -    val result = tEnv.sql(sqlQuery1).count()
    +    val sqlQuery1 = "SELECT * FROM A CROSS JOIN " +
    +      "(SELECT count(*) FROM A HAVING count(*) < 0)"
    +    val result = tEnv.sql(sqlQuery1)
    +    val expected =Seq(
    +      "2,2,Hello,null",
    +      "1,1,Hi,null",
    +      "3,2,Hello world,null").mkString("\n")
    --- End diff --
    
    The previous test was actually correct. A cross join is not an outer join 
and should not produce any result if one input is empty.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to