morhidi commented on PR #357: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/357#issuecomment-1232574252
Hi Folks, It would be really great to see what `faster` recovery means here, through an example. In general this sounds a fair benefit but before choosing a more complicated path here it would be great to see some obvious gains. Would this solution benefit reactive scaling for example? Would this mean that in case of a TM failure it could recover before the job is being restarted with a lower parallelism? @Grypse do you have any comparison that would help us decide to embrace this feature? Thanks, Matyas -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
