xintongsong commented on a change in pull request #11675: [FLINK-16745] Use 
JobManagerProcessUtils to start JM container and pass JVM memory args
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/11675#discussion_r407346335
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-clients/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/client/deployment/ClusterSpecification.java
 ##########
 @@ -18,20 +18,35 @@
 
 package org.apache.flink.client.deployment;
 
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmanager.JobManagerProcessSpec;
+import org.apache.flink.util.Preconditions;
+
+import static 
org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmanager.JobManagerProcessUtils.createDefaultJobManagerProcessSpec;
+
 /**
  * Description of the cluster to start by the {@link ClusterDescriptor}.
  */
 public final class ClusterSpecification {
+       private final JobManagerProcessSpec masterProcessSpec;
 
 Review comment:
   I'm not sure about adding `JobManagerProcessSpec` into 
`ClusterSpecification`.
   
   Actually, I was thinking about removing `ClusterSpecification`. After 
FLIP-116, all the information that `ClusterSpecification` carries can derived 
from configuration. We don't really need this data structure to hold the 
information, with the risk of potential inconsistency due to using `MB`. Please 
see FLINK-16734 for more details.
   
   Removing `ClusterSpecification` involves refactoring `ClusterDescriptor`, 
which is not necessary for this PR. But I would suggest to not add more usages 
to it.
   
   I think we can do the same thing for `masterMemoryMB` as we did for 
`taskManagerMemoryMB`:
   - Make `JavaCmdJobManagerDecorator#decorateFlinkPod` and  
`YarnClusterDescriptor#startAppMaster` derive `JobManagerProcessSpec` from 
configuration.
   - Leave it for `YarnClusterDescriptor#validateClusterResources`, but do not 
try to overwrite `jobManagerMemoryMb` when it is smaller than 
`yarnMinAllocationMB`.
   
   WDYT?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to