carp84 commented on a change in pull request #7674: [FLINK-10043] [State 
Backends] Refactor RocksDBKeyedStateBackend object 
construction/initialization/restore code
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7674#discussion_r256719361
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/state/StateBackendBuilder.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.runtime.state;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.Collection;
+
+/**
+ * A mutable builder to build a state backend instance
+ *
+ * @param <T> The type of the state backend instance
+ * @param <S> The type of the state handle
+ */
+public interface StateBackendBuilder<T, S> {
+       T build() throws IOException;
+
+       StateBackendBuilder setRestoreStateHandles(Collection<S> 
restoreStateHandles);
 
 Review comment:
   Let me make `stateHandles` parameter in builder constructor and remove the 
setter from interface. And I agree that we could just use 
`SupplierWithException` but this will force the method name to be `get` instead 
of `build` and make it hard to detect the caller of builder. So I suggest to 
still create the builder interface. What's your opinion?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to