[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14655219#comment-14655219
]
Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-6515:
---------------------------------------
See http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/commit/829feade,
I've changed it accept MBR and MBW custom comparators as they have (in spec)
different sorting requirements (and the comparators can be more typed) though
you can reuse the same instance (as in the test) if all you need is to put
custom providers on top.
Re multiple compare calls - this is because all the providers, default and
custom are in the the same collection.
While I do like/prefer the idea that a custom matching comparator should always
win, I need to 'warn' you that using custom comparators is not compliant :-)
Thanks
> provider sorting not right
> --------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-6515
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6515
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> Didnt dig too much into it but seems sorting with a custom comparator is not
> respected, can be linked to 6514, if this 6514 is fixed I'll test again to
> confirm this one
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
