ipv6-ops  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Matija Grabnar
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Doug Barton
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Matija Grabnar
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Darren Pilgrim
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Lyle Giese
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Matija Grabnar
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Lyle Giese
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Tim Chown
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Antonio Prado
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Nick Hilliard
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Kurt Jaeger
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Lorenzo Colitti
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Gert Doering
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Jared Mauch
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Gert Doering
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Jared Mauch
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Jared Mauch
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Jared Mauch
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Nick Hilliard
  • RE: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Matthew Huff
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Doug Barton
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Doug Barton
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Doug Barton
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Nick Hilliard
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Darren Pilgrim
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Philipp Kern
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • RE: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Matthew Huff
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 🔓Dan Wing
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Michael Chang
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Emmanuel Thierry
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Gert Doering
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Marco d'Itri
  • RE: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Matthew Huff
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Philipp Kern
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Merike Kaeo
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Antonio Prado
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Merike Kaeo
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Stefan Neufeind
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying lots of IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Laurent GUERBY
  • Re: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818 Tony Finch
• Fwd: New I-D: IPv6 Extension Headers in the Real World Fernando Gont
• Windows phone 8.1 adds 464xlat support Ca By
  • Re: Windows phone 8.1 adds 464xlat support Xavier Beaudouin
  • Re: Windows phone 8.1 adds 464xlat support Ross Chandler
• Tracing IPv6 packet drops resulting from Extension Headers (e.g. to Google) Fernando Gont
  • Re: Tracing IPv6 packet drops resulting from Extension Headers (e.g. to Google) Dan Lüdtke
  • Re: Tracing IPv6 packet drops resulting from Extension Headers (e.g. to Google) Fernando Gont
  • Re: Tracing IPv6 packet drops resulting from Extension Headers (e.g. to Google) Lorenzo Colitti
  • IPv6 packets with HBH Yannis Nikolopoulos
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Yannis Nikolopoulos
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Yannis Nikolopoulos
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Fernando Gont
  • AAAA records (was: Re: IPv6 packets with HBH) Jens Link
  • Re: AAAA records (was: Re: IPv6 packets with HBH) Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Ole Troan
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Fernando Gont
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Yannis Nikolopoulos
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: IPv6 packets with HBH Ole Troan
• question about IPv6-DNS-nameserver link-local (with Interface-name) Thomas Schäfer
  • Re: question about IPv6-DNS-nameserver link-local (with Interface-name) Dan Lüdtke
  • Re: question about IPv6-DNS-nameserver link-local (with Interface-name) Tony Finch
  • RE: question about IPv6-DNS-nameserver link-local (with Interface-name) Frank Bulk (iname.com)
  • Re: question about IPv6-DNS-nameserver link-local (with Interface-name) Thomas Schäfer
  • RE: question about IPv6-DNS-nameserver link-local (with Interface-name) Tony Finch
• IPv6 Assignment for Server Teerapatr Kittiratanachai
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Jens Link
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Mark Tinka
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Teerapatr Kittiratanachai
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Tim Chown
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Mark Tinka
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Teerapatr Kittiratanachai
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Teerapatr Kittiratanachai
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Sander Steffann
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Teerapatr Kittiratanachai
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Sander Steffann
  • Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server Benedikt Stockebrand
• problem with www.xbox.com / akamai Thomas Schäfer
  • Re: problem with www.xbox.com / akamai Doug Barton
  • Re: problem with www.xbox.com / akamai niels=cluenet
  • Re: problem with www.xbox.com / akamai Doug Barton
  • Re: problem with www.xbox.com / akamai niels=cluenet
  • Re: problem with www.xbox.com / akamai niels=cluenet
• fyi Thomas Schäfer
• Large IPv6 Multicast Domains James Small
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Phil Mayers
  • Administrativa: auto-responder Phil Mayers
  • Re: Administrativa: auto-responder Phil Mayers
  • Re: Administrativa: auto-responder Daniel Roesen
  • RE: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains James Small
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Benedikt Stockebrand
  • RE: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains James Small
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Benedikt Stockebrand
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Gert Doering
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Phil Mayers
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Gert Doering
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Phil Mayers
  • RE: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains James Small
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Phil Mayers
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Stig Venaas
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Mark Tinka
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Phil Mayers
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains David Barak
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Phil Mayers
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Mark Tinka
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains Stig Venaas
  • Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains David Barak
• ratools for protocol hackers and network engineers Dan Luedtke
• Google-blacklisted IPv6 DNS servers Yannis Nikolopoulos
  • Re: Google-blacklisted IPv6 DNS servers Phil Mayers
  • Re: Google-blacklisted IPv6 DNS servers Yannis Nikolopoulos
• Congratulations to Cloudflare... Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Congratulations to Cloudflare... Dan York
  • Re: Congratulations to Cloudflare... Gert Doering
• Yet another Merit (ASN 237) IPv6 Darknet in the last months? Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Yet another Merit (ASN 237) IPv6 Darknet in the last months? Bill Owens
  • Re: Yet another Merit (ASN 237) IPv6 Darknet in the last months? Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Yet another Merit (ASN 237) IPv6 Darknet in the last months? Larry Blunk
• Windows 7 Prefix Policy Quirks James Small
• Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Philip Matthews
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Daniel Corbe
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Florian Lohoff
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Holger Zuleger
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Gert Doering
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Philip Matthews
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Gert Doering
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Tarko Tikan
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Philip Matthews
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Tarko Tikan
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Sander Steffann
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
  • Re: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Philip Matthews
  • RE: Residential subscribers: numbered or unnumbered? Anfinsen, Ragnar
• the SDN/NFV & stateful/stateless paradox Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
• Decent v6 GeoIP provider Ryan Rawdon
  • Re: Decent v6 GeoIP provider Ryan Rawdon
• 464XLAT CLAT for Linux Tore Anderson
  • Re: 464XLAT CLAT for Linux Thomas Schäfer
• IPv6-related (?) Bind issue Yannis Nikolopoulos
  • Re: IPv6-related (?) Bind issue Jeroen Massar
  • Re: IPv6-related (?) Bind issue Yannis Nikolopoulos
  • Re: IPv6-related (?) Bind issue Jeroen Massar
  • Re: IPv6-related (?) Bind issue Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • Re: IPv6-related (?) Bind issue Hannes Frederic Sowa
• interesting multicast packet Gert Doering
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Gert Doering
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Gert Doering
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Daniel Roesen
  • RE: interesting multicast packet Frank Bulk
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Gert Doering
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Stig Venaas
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Daniel Roesen
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Gert Doering
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Jeroen Massar
  • Re: interesting multicast packet Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Requirements for IPv6 firewalls (new IETF-ID) Fernando Gont
• Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage James Small
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Pim van Pelt
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Pim van Pelt
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Daniel Austin
  • RE: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Jean-Francois . TremblayING
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Chris Stone
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Lyle Giese
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Tim Chown
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Matija Grabnar
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Simon Perreault
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Enno Rey
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Gert Doering
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Andre Tomt
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Phil Pennock
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Noel Butler
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Валерий Солдатов
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Luigi Rosa
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Raoul Bhatia
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Seth Mos
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Bjørn Mork
  • RE: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Weber, Markus
  • Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage Mohacsi Janos

• Earlier messages
• Later messages