On 24/08/2014 09:20, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Aug 23, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Actually I think you should quibble. The issue isn't "bad" software >> used by intermediaries, it's that by design DMARC p=reject breaks a >> very common model used by intermediaries. Whether that is a bug or a >> feature in DMARC is out of scope for this thread, however. > I was not referring to the mailing lists issue, which is not relevant > unless you also use DMARC with p=reject, but to broken MTAs which mangle > forwarded messages (look for DKIM validation failures and you will > easily find many).
Oh, OK, that wasn't obvious from the context. Brian > There is a reason if DMARC was designed to use both SPF and DKIM. >
