Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> writes: > I'm not sure that the folks asking for IA_NA would be happy with IA_PD > though.
Why don't you just try and see? You have nothing to lose AFAICT. Bjørn
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Mark Tinka
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Mark Tinka
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNS... Roger Wiklund
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNS... Gert Doering
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and... James R Cutler
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNS... sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Philip Homburg
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Bjørn Mork
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Gert Doering
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Ola Thoresen
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Gert Doering
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Fernando Gont
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Gert Doering
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Fernando Gont
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Ivan Pepelnjak
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Gert Doering
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Philip Homburg
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has ... Gert Doering
