On 31/Mar/20 12:09, [email protected] wrote: > Note that there have been multiple requests for DHCPv6 to do this but > every attempt has been shot down. Yep - thankfully, we have an option. Operating two address assignment protocols is just silly. At my house, I don't even bother with DHCPv6 for DNS. I just use the IPv4 ones and let SLAAC assign IPv6 addresses to my devices. Just about done with the purist madness around this. Mark.
- Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Roger Wiklund
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? James R Cutler
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Enno Rey
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL... Fernando Gont
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL... Tim Chown
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Mark Tinka
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL... sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and D... Mark Tinka
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS a... Roger Wiklund
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS a... Gert Doering
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RD... James R Cutler
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA ha... sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... Philip Homburg
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... Bjørn Mork
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... Gert Doering
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... Ola Thoresen
