On 31/Mar/20 02:30, Roger Wiklund wrote: > > > When I read DHCPv6 vs SLAAC it often boils down to "control" but I > don't see the need to allocate a dynamic address if the autogenerated > are used. For client's you dont really have any inbound connections > unless it's a support case. > > What's your view on this? We only use DHCPv6 to assign IPv6 DNS addresses to devices. Otherwise, we rely on SLAAC. DHCPv6 took itself out of the running when it failed to provide the default gateway to its clients. Mark.
- Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Roger Wiklund
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? James R Cutler
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Enno Rey
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL... Fernando Gont
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL... Tim Chown
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL? Mark Tinka
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL... sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and D... Mark Tinka
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS a... Roger Wiklund
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS a... Gert Doering
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RD... James R Cutler
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA ha... sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... Philip Homburg
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... sthaug
- Re: Why used DHCPv6 when R... Bjørn Mork
