Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote:
>> (I think that all of AH might fall into that, sadly)
> Also, when elevating a document to STD, it should not have errata.
> (See RFC20 for why I wrote “should not”, not “MUST NOT”.) RFC 4301 has
> 2 verified, 7 HFDU.
> Unfortunately, respinning a document that is twenty years old will
> require significant review, so the WG should be sure it has the energy
> to take this on.
We'd also have to be really clear that the "ESPv3" effort is not included,
and we aren't opening the document(s) to that.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
