On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 7:18 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> > I was going through documents, and I was supprised that when we made > RFC7296 > into STD79, that we didn't include RFC4301 into STD79. > (and maybe 4302 and 4303) > Does it make sense to include it into the IKE protocol STD, or should we create one for IPsec itself? But yes, they should be promoted from PROPOSED STANDARD to INTERNET STANDARD :) Paul > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
